Who reviews this website
Dr. Dustin Moffitt, ND is a Naturopathic physician. Dr. Dustin Moffitt, ND reviews this website in full: the product copy, the bottle, the ingredients, and every journal post before it is published. Nothing on this site ships until that review is done.
Dr. Dustin Moffitt, ND
Naturopathic physician.
Reviews the content, the bottle, the ingredients and every post on this website.
About
About Sodaslimnow and how these pages are written
Sodaslimnow is a USA authorized retailer for SodaSlim. We hold stock, publish what the label and the supplier pack state, and answer the phone. We do not make the product and we are not the manufacturer. This site is written to eight rules, and the three that cost the most are visible everywhere: never invent a number, which is why no amount and no caffeine figure appears on any page here; never invent a person, which is why there is no rating, no order count and no testimonial; and never describe a picture as a label, which is why the supplied bottle rendering is published with its misspellings named rather than used as evidence.
By the SodaSlim Editorial Desk · Last updated September 24, 2026
Who we are
What Sodaslimnow is, in one paragraph and then in detail
Sodaslimnow is a USA authorized retailer for SodaSlim. We hold stock, publish what the label and the supplier pack state, and answer the phone. We do not make the product and we are not the manufacturer.
In practice that is three jobs. We hold stock of SodaSlim, currently lot SOD-26/SO-1902. We publish what the label and the supplier pack state, including the parts that do the product no favours. And we pass orders to the SodaSlim order desk, the telephone number in the header of every page, which belongs to the seller rather than to us.
What we are not: the manufacturer, the formulator, a laboratory, a clinic or a regulator. We did not choose what goes in the bottle and we cannot see your order. The only thing we control is the accuracy of the description.
Every page is written against the supplied artwork, the supplier pack and the five sources in the reference lists, and carries the date it was last checked. Where the supplied material is silent the page prints not published and lists the gap rather than filling it. There is no ghostwritten expert, no medical advisory board and no reviewer we invented.
The three findings this site is built on
First: nothing on this label is quantified, and the missing figure that matters most is caffeine, which three of the five named ingredients contain.
Second: no verified review data exists, so there is no rating, no order count and no testimonial anywhere on this site.
Third: the bottle picture supplied is a rendering with misspelled type on it, so it cannot verify anything printed.
Method
Eight rules this site is written to
These are not aspirations. Each one has cost this site something concrete, and the cost is named inside the rule.
The label wins
Every fact on this site comes from the label and the supplier pack first. Where the seller's listing and the label disagree, the label is what we publish and we say the two disagreed. A listing is marketing; a label is the part a regulator can read.
Never invent a number
If nothing published states it, this site writes not published and stops. That rule costs more here than on most products, because what it stops us writing is every amount on the label and the one figure both FDA and NIH publish limits for: the caffeine content of a capsule whose first named ingredient is caffeine anhydrous.
Never invent a person
No reviewer, no doctor and no case study appears anywhere on this site. The review material supplied with this stock is marked in the supplier pack as layout copy, so the reviews page carries no testimonial, no rating and no order count, and no page here emits rating markup.
Never describe a picture as a label
The bottle image supplied with this stock is a rendering, and four lines of its own type are misspelled. We publish it with the problem named, take the wording of the support lines from the supplier pack instead, and do not claim any seal on it is printed on a bottle.
Only sources we opened
The reference lists name five pages we read, on September 24, 2026. We cite them for what they say rather than for what would be convenient, and none of them tested SodaSlim.
Print the disagreement
On garcinia our two sources do not line up. NIH says it has little to no effect on weight loss; NCCIH says it is unclear, that some evidence suggests a modest effect while other evidence shows no effect, and that several cases of liver damage have been reported, some severe, though this appears to be uncommon. We print both rather than the one that reads better.
Never describe a document we have not seen
Lot SOD-26/SO-1902 and certificate reference SOD-1902-26-SO were supplied with this stock. The lot and certificate references supplied with this stock are draft label values, not laboratory proof. No certificate of analysis document has reached this desk, and a reference string is not a document. No page here summarises a certificate, links one or implies that one exists.
Publish the unflattering finding first
The findings that do this product the least good, an unquantified label with no caffeine figure and no verified review data at all, are in the footer of every page and at the top of the pages they belong to, above the pricing rather than below it.
Money
The earnings disclosure, in plain words
Sodaslimnow earns a commission when you buy SodaSlim through the links on this site. You pay the same price either way: $138, $177 or $294 depending on the pack, charged on the seller's order page in US dollars.
That is a reason to read this site sceptically, which is why it sits in the footer of every page. The practical check is not what we say about our independence but what the pages contain, and three are worth holding us to. The label page says there is no panel and no amount for any of the five ingredients. The reviews page has no rating, no order count and no testimonials. And the batch page says plainly that no certificate of analysis has reached this desk and that the only bottle picture supplied is a rendering.
What the commission does not buy
It does not buy a sentence, a heading or an omission. Nobody has asked us to remove a finding, and if anyone did, the request would go on this page with the date on it.
Prices, packs and the 60-day window are the seller's terms and can change without telling us. The pricing page carries what we hold today, dated.
Open questions
What we still do not know about this product
- Every amount. No Supplement Facts panel was supplied, and no figure is published for any of the five ingredients.
- The caffeine content. Three of the five ingredients contain caffeine and no total is published, so neither FDA's 400 mg figure nor NIH's 400 to 500 mg figure can be applied.
- The other ingredients, the capsule shell and any allergen statement.
- A manufacturer or distributor name. Nothing on the artwork or the listing names who makes it.
- A printed best-before date, a storage instruction, and the hours the order desk is open.
- A photograph of a printed label. The bottle picture supplied is a rendering with misspelled type on it, so it cannot verify anything.
- A certificate of analysis document. The lot and CoA references supplied are draft label values rather than laboratory proof.
- Any verified review data. What came with the pack is marked as layout copy, so this site publishes no rating, no order count and no testimonials.
- What is inside the five bonus guides, which packs include them and how they are delivered.
- Any published trial on the finished SodaSlim formula.
Ten items. The second is the spine of this site: three of the five named ingredients contain caffeine, no total is printed, and the published limits from FDA and NIH are therefore unusable on this bottle. The sixth is the one that reshapes two whole pages, and the eighth turns the page that normally sells a supplement into a page explaining why it is empty.
Corrections
Email [email protected] with the page and the line. Corrections are made and dated. The website desk covers pages, typos, privacy and press, Monday to Friday, 9:00am - 5:00pm ET.
The website desk cannot see orders. There is no order screen at that address, no tracking view and no way to issue a refund. Anything involving money, a parcel or a change to an order goes to the order desk on +1 (302) 200-3480.
Where the medical questions belong
The label itself says to talk to a doctor before use if you take medicine, and FDA notes that certain conditions tend to make people more sensitive to caffeine's effects, as can some medications, and recommends talking to a health care provider about limiting caffeine if you are pregnant, trying to become pregnant or breastfeeding. That conversation belongs with a clinician rather than with a checkout.
Read the label before you read the price
Every page here starts from what is actually published. If you want the product, two bottles is $138 for 60 days with a 60-day money-back window.
Order desk +1 (302) 200-3480 · opening hours not published
Questions
SodaSlim: common questions
Who runs Sodaslimnow?
Do you make SodaSlim?
Do you earn money if I buy?
Is anything here written or reviewed by a doctor?
Why is there no rating anywhere on this site?
Why do you keep saying the bottle picture is a rendering?
How do I report a mistake?
What would you change your mind about?
References
- National Institutes of Health, Office of Dietary Supplements. Dietary Supplements for Weight Loss: Fact Sheet for Consumers. https://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/WeightLoss-Consumer/
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Green Tea. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/green-tea
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health. Garcinia Cambogia. https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/garcinia-cambogia
Every source above was opened and read on September 24, 2026. None of them tested SodaSlim itself. They describe the named ingredients and the product category, which is a different thing from testing this finished formula.